Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-11-11 03:30:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Created an attachment (id=323134) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323134) [details] > output on a compile with attached diff (1) > > Attach output from a rake -v when compiling against the system-wide provided > boost-static libraries You should link against libboost_thread-mt.so, not against static archive libboost_thread-mt.a. But anyway linkage fails by other reasons like ----------------------------------------------------------------- ApplicationPoolServerExecutable.cpp:86: undefined reference to `boost::this_thread::interruption_requested()' ----------------------------------------------------------------- (and many errors). It seems that this is because Fedora ships boot 1.34 while these symbols are introduced on 1.36+. So until Fedora upgrades boost we have to use internal boost. In this case Fedora compilation flags must be treated correctly. The following seems to fix this issue: ------------------------------------------------------------------ --- Rakefile.orig 2008-11-11 16:23:45.000000000 +0900 +++ Rakefile 2008-11-11 17:23:32.000000000 +0900 @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ subdir 'ext/boost/src' do file 'libboost_thread.a' => Dir['*.cpp'] + Dir['pthread/*.cpp'] do - flags = "#{OPTIMIZATION_FLAGS} -fPIC -I../.. #{THREADING_FLAGS} -DNDEBUG #{MULTI_ARCH_FLAGS}" + flags = "#{OPTIMIZATION_FLAGS} #{APACHE2::CXXFLAGS} -fPIC -I../.. #{THREADING_FLAGS} -DNDEBUG #{MULTI_ARCH_FLAGS}" compile_cxx "*.cpp", flags # NOTE: 'compile_cxx "pthread/*.cpp", flags' doesn't work on some systems, # so we do this instead. ------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review