Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 --- Comment #8 from Jeroen van Meeuwen <kanarip@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-11-10 18:50:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #2) > > (...snip...) > > Unfortunately, there seems to be no easy way to fix Problem 2 (Problem 1 is > easy enough to fix by the rubygem-passenger upstream). All releases of the > mod_scgi code are under the CNRI license (although, changes made after 1.10 are > under MIT). Some methods of fixing this issue would be: > > 1. Removing all of the copied code from mod_scgi 1.09, then replacing it either > with clean-room written code (aka, code written by someone who has never looked > at mod_scgi) or restructuring the rubygem-passenger code so that it is not > necessary. > > 2. Getting permission from CNRI to use that code under different (GPLv2 > compatible) terms. They seem to use MIT for changes to that codebase these > days, perhaps they would give permission for the copied code to be used under > those terms? > > However, until this issue is resolved, this one can't go any farther, sorry. Would another solution be to use mod_scgi >= 1.10? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review