Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 --- Comment #8 from Christopher D. Stover <quantumburnz@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-11-10 13:07:31 EDT --- Yes! Getting closer. =) I'm sorry, I should have caught some of those fixes you put in the last comment so I hope you don't think I'm trying to torture you. I really do appreciate all your help! [Chris@localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint barry.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [Chris@localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/barry-* 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. %{_mandir}/man1/ and %{_datadir}/applications/ are owned by filesystem. Do I need to add a Requires for that or just leave it out since I would assume it's pretty standard to have in every system? I added the sed commands in there so hopefully the Rpath problem is resolved. I'm half tempted to merge the gui package and main package with command line utilities. Upstream has them separated but I see no reason to separate the single gui program from everything else. It just seems like extra work for the end user to install another package. What do you think? Any reason not to do this? SRPM: http://8uxodw.bay.livefilestore.com/y1pxYRuced4yd5SYGYEd0OdOc4HaHOKqTMeFGB1XvaCqgGoTv2lBmjZsvcY6wHZbTJcY5e4eSusYB_Pq0-Gxm333Q/barry-0.14-3.fc10.src.rpm?download SPEC: http://8uxodw.bay.livefilestore.com/y1pxYRuced4yd6JBXr2Z-CQqsy3UJmOHAdlbNgSGd2MssbkpTlCm5U7FowYLUs2X0X9W3WEBh8e-EQLyVrWKRQQtQ/barry.spec?download -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review