Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 --- Comment #13 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-11-10 01:57:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > The config file is the official way to adapt it to a particular platform. > > > > Unless you manage to make this patch adopted by upstream, you can consider this > > package and your request for sponsorship on hold. > > I don't understand this well. OK, more direct: 1. If you want to see this patch included into this package, ask the Debian upstream to include this patch into their sources and to change their package's behavior to rely on the implicit defaults. Right now, they are shipping this config file, they are relying upon, it's their package's documented behavor. > First, the configuration file is not required, just optional. Wrong, using this file is the official, nominal behavior. You are shipping a crippled and hacked package. 2. Your answers are demonstrating, that you might not be sufficiently skilled for contributing to Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review