Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 --- Comment #6 from Christopher D. Stover <quantumburnz@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-11-09 15:30:59 EDT --- Hi Hans, thanks for the full review. I didn't realize those directory ownership issues were a problem before but I've read up on them and it makes sense now. Hopefully they should all be fixed now. Output from rpmlint: [Chris@localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint barry.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [Chris@localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/barry* 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I moved the libs out of the main package and back into their own package again. I also put *.so in the devel package. I added Requires: libopensync to the opensync package to make sure %{_libdir}/opensync exists. I cleaned up the doc directory -- removed *.sh and *.php which were used to create the *.html files. I added --disable-rpath to the %configure lines instead of the sed commands you pasted. I don't have a 64-bit machine to test on but can you let me know if this fixes the problem? If not, I'll have to use the sed commands. SPEC: http://8uxodw.bay.livefilestore.com/y1pzd9Tb3TfRlfB2LpwvfmZ4cu_zknwrn_D9-R9BaHNGIqgS355w_eUnWkcl8ZAFYbvTVArCdxuo4Q/barry.spec?download SRPM: http://8uxodw.bay.livefilestore.com/y1pzd9Tb3TfRlc7jRbx1-VYIoiOdC3wZL9botvMNwIskrSRYQmuAyM9wz5FosWRUw8TY1opI1uyiFk/barry-0.14-2.fc10.src.rpm?download -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review