[Bug 469808] Review Request: pstreams-devel - POSIX Process Control in C++

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469808


Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx




--- Comment #18 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx>  2008-11-08 08:23:38 EDT ---
According to the Package Naming Conventions, shouldn't this package be named
pstreams instead of pstreams-devel? The dash is a separator which shouldn't be
used in the base name of the package.

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#General_Naming

Of course, pstreams should then provide pstreams-devel = %{version}-%{release}
.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]