[Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958





--- Comment #4 from Christopher D. Stover <quantumburnz@xxxxxxxxxxx>  2008-11-04 17:05:14 EDT ---
Thanks for your thorough initial review Hans!  I feel bad you found so much
wrong the first time around, but I've made the fixes.  Here's the new output
from rpmlint:

[Chris@localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint barry.spec
barry.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 10, tab: line 4)
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

[Chris@localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/barry-0.14-1.fc10.src.rpm 
barry.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 10, tab: line 4)
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

[Chris@localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/barry-*
barry.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libbarry.so
barry-devel.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/barry-devel-0.14/www/static.sh
barry-devel.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/barry-devel-0.14/www/clean.sh
barry-devel.i386: W: doc-file-dependency
/usr/share/doc/barry-devel-0.14/www/clean.sh R
barry-devel.i386: W: doc-file-dependency
/usr/share/doc/barry-devel-0.14/www/static.sh R
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.

I'm ignoring the library warning because it's not a devel file, it's required
for the utilities to work.  I'm also ignoring the doc file warnings because the
shell scripts do need to be executable, and they generate/remove html devel
documentation if the user runs them.

In regards to your comments:
* I'm not sure what happened with my source tarball.  I redownloaded it so
please let me know if it still appears to be different this time.

* The .desktop file is in the SRPM this time.

* I got rid of the libs and util package and consolidated them into the main
package.  Since the libraries are built from source and the libs package was
required to do anything useful, I figured it made sense.  Let me know if
there's a problem with this.  Also, I chose to consolidate the util package
instead of gui because I see the util as more basic things to make the
Blackberry work with Linux.

Thanks again for your input and let me know what you think this time around.

SPEC URL:
http://8uxodw.bay.livefilestore.com/y1pX2QxGel80n1v0PasG0m-xSKp6YpCGEeOWnmN8rtAMELCATbd7GLcbMgylxarFMM3hKLHXhHWlPpXmnFciqdCDQ/barry.spec?download

SRPM URL:
http://8uxodw.bay.livefilestore.com/y1pX2QxGel80n1RK93qW0QkHr7q7HjnLMWS-65DxnUq66tI0412d2ruZCsj0cJJdqE0A-qGmzzCnw9Hmp1MYT-5tA/barry-0.14-1.fc10.src.rpm?download

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]