[Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054





--- Comment #13 from David Carter <dcarter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  2008-11-04 02:49:58 EDT ---
Updated versions:

Spec URL: http://arm4.org/Downloads/0.8-0.5/arm4.spec
SRPM URL: http://arm4.org/Downloads/0.8-0.5/arm4-0.8-0.5.fc9.src.rpm

I must say though, it's kind of annoying to hit an rpmlint update in the few
short hour between submission and review :)

Some comments on these reported errors though. First of all, despite the
assertion of rpmlint, there are many cases where this is a valid design choice,
such as when a common error handler is put in a library. In this case, it was
used in panic conditions only, and I still think that's valid. At this point,
the fix is largely cosmetic, although I will address this more completely for a
future release.

Which brings me to the larger issue. Fixing this will always require an
architectural rethink. At the very least, it will require a change to the
library version number, potentially putting it out of sync with the upstream
version. Ultimately this isn't the responsibility of the packager, but of the
original developer, and as pointed out already the developer may just say deal
with it. Honestly, if I weren't also the upstream developer, I wouldn't have
changed anything. As it is, I'm fixing internal libraries that provide no
public API for problems that I don't think exist.

I guess my point is that this warning should largely be ignored during reviews.
The dangers of not doing so are too great.

OK, rant done, the new code removes these warnings.

With regard to your comments on the practice review, I did use the checklist at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines. I'll do a better job
of noting the pass/fail states next time. I'll do a couple of additional
reviews later this week when I get some of my work out of the way.

Thanks!
Dave

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]