[Bug 454408] Review Request: mingw32-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408





--- Comment #15 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx>  2008-11-02 05:05:52 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #14)

> Finally, I would have approved this package, if it wasn't providing this:
> mingw32-binutils(x86-64) = 2.18.50_20080109_2-8.fc10
> 
> What is this meant to mean? IMO, it's meaningless.

It's added automatically as far as I'm aware.  In this package
we don't override RPM's normal dependency generation.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]