Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-11-01 08:33:47 EDT --- First of all: (In reply to comment #16) > SRPM URL: > http://www.torsten.rausche.net/fedora/review/nxtvepg/nxtvepg-2.8.1-1.fc9.src.rpm - I must say this srpm (tarball in this srpm) is problematic. Almost all codes in 2.8.1 tarball are still under GPLv2 (strict), however newly added tv_grab_ttx.pl is under GPLv3+, which are, unfortunately, incompatible: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#GPL_Compatibility_Matrix You need to fix license issue first. (In reply to comment #16) > How much time will it cost then to do > the same with a foreign package? I guess you will take much less time than the package you develop by yourself and release by yourself. > Do I > have to check every single point in that pre-reviews to get them honored? I don't know what you mean by "single point", however please check at least what is written on "ReviewGuidelines" and "Guidelines" wiki > How > many pre-reviews will I have to do? At least one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review