[Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077





--- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  2008-11-01 08:33:47 EDT ---
First of all:
(In reply to comment #16)
> SRPM URL:
> http://www.torsten.rausche.net/fedora/review/nxtvepg/nxtvepg-2.8.1-1.fc9.src.rpm

- I must say this srpm (tarball in this srpm) is problematic.

  Almost all codes in 2.8.1 tarball are still under GPLv2 (strict), however
  newly added tv_grab_ttx.pl is under GPLv3+, which are, unfortunately,
  incompatible:
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#GPL_Compatibility_Matrix
  You need to fix license issue first.

(In reply to comment #16)
> How much time will it cost then to do
> the same with a foreign package? 

I guess you will take much less time than the package you develop by yourself
and release by yourself.

> Do I
> have to check every single point in that pre-reviews to get them honored? 

I don't know what you mean by "single point", however please check at least
what is written on "ReviewGuidelines" and "Guidelines" wiki

> How
> many pre-reviews will I have to do?
At least one.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]