[Bug 454408] Review Request: mingw32-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408





--- Comment #12 from Levente Farkas <lfarkas@xxxxxxxxxxx>  2008-10-31 10:44:55 EDT ---
i mean all mingw32 packages.
but main question here why do you use this Provides/Obsoletes trick in this
packages when don't use in any other packages?
currently i'd like to install parallel our old mingw packages and these new
ming32 to test and compare them and this's the only place where they conflict.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]