Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468570 --- Comment #2 from Andy Theuninck <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-30 14:23:34 EDT --- Whoops. CORRECT spec link: http://gohanman.com/rpm/Fedora9/SPECS/webmin.spec It's very loosely based on the upstream SPEC. I gutted out tons of the original %pre/%post mess and made the %files section saner (so it actually includes every file or directory the package creates). I made a few changes to the spec based on suggestions in the linked bug. I'll rebuild the SRPM later (no rpmbuild on my webhost). Changes that are just in the spec, currently: * Vendor tag removed * License changed to GPL * The last few extraneous echos [to stdout] removed I left %clean as [ "%{buildroot}" != "/" ]. I don't see any harm in checking against a possibly catastrophic mistake. I have the backup of /etc/webmin in place still, although I'm copying it to /var/webmin instead of leaving it as a dotfile in /etc. Size-wise, /etc/webmin comes in at 1.1MB on my system. If that's too much space, there's probably no real harm in getting rid of the backup entirely and letting rawhide/new release testers fend for themselves. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review