Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 --- Comment #20 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <orcanbahri@xxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-29 23:50:37 EDT --- I separated deco-archive from deco (Bug# 469134). Therefore one of them will not need to be rebuilt everytime the other one is updated by the upstream. Right now, there is a circular dependency between the two packages. I'm not sure if this is allowed. But obviously they both need each other. Any ideas are welcome. Also, because of the separation, the rpmlint output for deco is silent now. Those messages made a trip to deco-archive. The new files are: SPEC: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/deco.spec SRPM: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/deco-1.5.6-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review