Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 --- Comment #14 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-29 15:54:17 EDT --- Well, there is a kernel module in this stack: /lib/modules/2.6.27.4-61.fc10.x86_64/kernel/fs/fuse/fuse.ko Sun is clearly working around the incompatibility between CDDL and GPL (one they explicitly created), but circumventing license incompatibility like this is not forbidden, in fact, it is almost certainly the main reason why the Fuse userspace is not GPL. In fact, they explicitly permit the scenario that Rahul is so concerned about in Comment #13: http://fuse.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/FAQ#Under_what_conditions_may_I_modify_or_distribute_FUSEx3f. There was never any requirement that any userspace code that leverages kernel code be compatible with the kernel license, for anything, otherwise, we'd have nothing but GPL compatible userspace. If it linked to GPL code, this would be a different scenario, but it does not. Nevertheless, I bounced this issue to RH Legal to get their feedback. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review