[Bug 466183] Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183


Matt Domsch <matt_domsch@xxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |vcrhonek@xxxxxxxxxx




--- Comment #10 from Matt Domsch <matt_domsch@xxxxxxxx>  2008-10-29 13:55:08 EDT ---
Let's try to get this part straight...

In OpenSUSE "factory " (equivalent of Fedora rawhide):

sblim-sfcb
Provides: cim-server
Provides: cimserver

tog-pegasus
Provides: cim-server

In the current sblim-sfcb for Fedora being proposed, you have:
Provides: cimserver = %{version}-%{release}

and unfortunately, Fedora's tog-pegasus has neither of these lines.

Can we all agree that:
Provides: cim-server

is the "right" thing to add?  That way package Requires: and/or yum install
lines can all agree to use cim-server.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]