Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla <limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-29 08:20:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #16) > > >> The file: > > >> examples-ml/Combinatorica5.m > > >> Cannot be included in Fedora cue to the following licensing clause: > > >> > > >> This package may be copied in its entirety for nonprofit purposes only. > > >> Sale, other than for the direct cost of the media, is prohibited. This > > >> copyright notice must accompany all copies. > > > > > >Good spot. Will rm in prep. > > > > No, you need a modified tarball, so it doesn't wind up in the SRPM. > > See:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#When_Upstream_uses_Prohibited_Code > > That links says "Some upstream packages include patents or trademarks that we > are not allowed to ship even as source code." It does not say we need to remove > improperly licensed files from the source tarball. Read the next sentence in that paragraph: "In these cases you have to modify the source tarball to remove this code before you even upload it to the build system." > > Yeah, probably disable. And your -static/-devel explanation is IMHO sound. > > Alright. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review