Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463922 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks|177841 | AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-28 14:00:08 EDT --- Seems good except for: * Timestamp on original tarball is not kept https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps Please re-download the original tarball by: $ wget -N http://gael.roualland.free.fr/ifstat/ifstat-1.1.tar.gz for example. * Files under %_mandir are automatically marked as %doc. * Please change the release number to X%{?dist} (2%{?dist}, for example) (I guess you want to do so after the review is passed) Well, + This package itself is now okay (but please fix above) + You have also other review requests, which seems good to some extent Okay. -------------------------------------------------------------- This package (itstat) is APPROVED by mtasaka -------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Install the Client Tools (Koji) ". Now I am sponsoring you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9/10, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review