Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #11 from Conrad Meyer <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-28 13:36:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Not really. .a libs, generally, are 644 (ls -al /usr/lib64/*.a or /usr/lib/*.a) Ah, when I checked a random lib I must have found a lib that was 755. My mistake! I am glad this way works ok also. I looked at the examples and source and they are only a few megs uncompressed and probably compress well, so I don't think it's a big deal having it all in one package. Besides, to use the library (i.e. link against it, it's static) you probably want the documentation anyway. In the future doing reviews you might just omit the stuff that's OK or N/A and just tell me the stuff I'm doing wrong :D. But I appreciate the (practice) review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review