[Bug 468643] Review Request: perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction - Expose PL_dirty

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468643


Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx>  2008-10-27 23:29:18 EDT ---
I had hoped to get that done before leaving work, but....

rpmlint says:
  perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-debuginfo.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long 
   This package provides debug information for package 
   perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction.
which indeed is long, but not really under your control.

Really, the only issue I see is the summary, which I trust you'll fix up to
something comprehensible before you check in.

* source files match upstream:
   1c6665a98a7ee12d2e0ca926b800561f8ff4ea36daf487c02030a12f7a2b959c  
   Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.02.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
X summary is seriously cryptic.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint has acceptable complaints.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   GlobalDestruction.so()(64bit)
   perl(Devel::GlobalDestruction) = 0.02
   perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction = 0.02-1.fc10
   perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction(x86-64) = 0.02-1.fc10
  =
   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
   perl(Sub::Exporter)
   perl(strict)
   perl(vars)
   perl(warnings)

* %check is present and all tests pass:
   All tests successful.
   Files=1, Tests=4,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr  0.01 sys +  0.01 cusr  0.00 
    csys =  0.03 CPU)
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no generically named files
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.

APPROVED

The package review process needs reviewers!  If you haven't done any package
reviews recently, please consider doing one.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]