Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-26 15:33:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Attempt #5 (current package, successful): > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=904318 I will look at this after I wake up again. > (In reply to comment #9) > > (In reply to comment #8) > > > Care to comment? Upstream provides a gem > > Then you must use the gem as the source > This one is new for me... can you elaborate on the fact that if it's a gem, you > must use the upstream provided gem? I can't seem to find the guidelines saying > that I should. Please recheck this. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Ruby_Gems - The Source of the package must be the full URL to the released Gem archive; the version of the package must be the Gem's version (In reply to comment #12) > I found GPLv2+ too in ext/q_parser.c. Pending other comments, I'll push these > changes when we're done. Please also check Bison exception mentioned in the file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review