Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468466 --- Comment #3 from Simon Wesp <cassmodiah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-25 17:54:33 EDT --- Spec URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/libgksu-2.0.7/libgksu.spec SRPM URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/libgksu-2.0.7/libgksu-2.0.7-2.fc10.src.rpm [!] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [rpm@laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i libgksu-2.0.7-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPM(s): [rpm@laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint libgksu-* libgksu.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gksu.schemas 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454208#c4 - We regards GConf schemas files as _not_ a configuration file so please remove %config(noreplace) attribution on GConf schemas file (even if rpmlint warns about it) [!] The spec file handles locales properly. You added 'BuildRequires: gettext-devel' acc. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files 'BR: gettext' is sufficient fixed [!] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. - 'desktop-file-install --vendor="fedora" \' is obsolete for new packages. see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/DesktopFileVendor fixed The .desktop file is in the wrong package. I think that a better place is gksu (#468467), or am I wrong? gksu is just the frontend and the desktopfile links to the wizard application that set the properties of the API, or am I wrong? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review