Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435015 --- Comment #13 from Tim Fenn <fenn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-24 16:28:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Umm.. I cannot guess why you want to name binary rpm names as > libgpp4 and libgpp4-devel. Simply gpp4 and gpp4-devel is better. > I'd be happy to rename it gpp4 and gpp4-devel (as I originally packaged it), but see comments 4-8 above - I'm a bit confused as to what is best here. > > By the way rebuild fails on ppc64: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=901509 > Now that I am sponsoring you, you can try to rebuild arbitrary srpms > on koji by > > $ koji build --scratch <target> <srpm_you_want_to_try> > where target can be dist-f11, dist-f10, dist-f9-updates-candidate > or dist-f8-updates-candidate. > If the build is successful, the rebuilt rpms and some logs are > put for one week or so under: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/<your_FAS_name>/task_<task_id> Many thanks for the tip, Mamoru. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review