Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435015 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-24 13:58:35 EDT --- Umm.. I cannot guess why you want to name binary rpm names as libgpp4 and libgpp4-devel. Simply gpp4 and gpp4-devel is better. Debian seems to name binary debs providing system wide libraries as libXXXXX (like libpango1.0-0) while Fedora simply names binary rpms using source tarball name as much as possible (like pango) (For me I maintain oniguruma while debian uses libonig as binary deb names...) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#General_Naming By the way rebuild fails on ppc64: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=901509 Now that I am sponsoring you, you can try to rebuild arbitrary srpms on koji by $ koji build --scratch <target> <srpm_you_want_to_try> where target can be dist-f11, dist-f10, dist-f9-updates-candidate or dist-f8-updates-candidate. If the build is successful, the rebuilt rpms and some logs are put for one week or so under: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/<your_FAS_name>/task_<task_id> -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review