Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 R P Herrold <herrold@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |herrold@xxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #15 from R P Herrold <herrold@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-24 11:44:04 EDT --- The law of unintended packaging consequesces may be in play here. On a scratch build without a set --vendor tag set I get: + desktop-file-install --dir=/var/tmp/homestead-0.86-1orc-root-herrold/usr/share/applications /home/herrold/rpmbuild/SOURCES/homestead.desktop Must specify the vendor namespace for these files with --vendor error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.49715 (%install) so a portibility patch of having a %define localvendor %vendor%nil and then using localvendor construct is needed, here and in the the broader policy? No criticism of this fine effort within the four walls of fedora and rhel %vendor, but ... Just talking out loud here on the broader issue of NOT fighting with other efforts in how spec files are written. -- Russ herrold -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review