Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453109 Dennis Gilmore <dgilmore@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dgilmore@xxxxxxxxxx Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Dennis Gilmore <dgilmore@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-24 11:02:39 EDT --- 52289f16f8504f954369c6a3f065eec7892d6649 nocpulse-common-2.0.8.tar.gz 52289f16f8504f954369c6a3f065eec7892d6649 /home/dgilmore/rpmbuild/SOURCES/nocpulse-common-2.0.8.tar.gz sha1sum of source matches rpmlint gives nocpulse-common.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/nocpulse nocpulse nocpulse-common.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/nocpulse nocpulse nocpulse-common.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/nocpulse nocpulse nocpulse-common.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/nocpulse nocpulse nocpulse-common.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided NPusers nocpulse-common.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided np-config i disagree with not putting provides in but ill accept it without. builds in mock on rawhide. # This src.rpm is cannonical upstream # You can obtain it using this set of commands # git clone git://git.fedorahosted.org/git/spacewalk.git/ # cd monitoring/nocpulse-common # make srpm needs to be removed from the spec. but can be done at import time. Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review