Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466777 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-22 23:29:20 EDT --- The specfile seems to still be 1.4, but I can pull it from the srpm. Is 1.6 an actual release? Because that doesn't seem to make sense when the only way to get it is to check it out of git. You need to provide instructions for actually checking the packaged version out of git, not just what's currently at the head of the tree. I know you probably depend on the names now, but is there really any point in postfixing the executable names with ".pl"? It's up to you, of course, and this wouldn't be the first package to do this, but I've never understood why anyone would care what language a particular executable is written in. I note this package provides perl(Satcon) = 1.3, which is... odd. The module version differs from the package version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review