Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467175 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #9 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-22 16:51:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Answer from Sam Vilain <sam@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > AFAIK the original author has not responded to requests for relicensing > under GPLv2. Which is odd, given that another of their projects, > Tangram was *only* available under the GPL, and it *required* > Set::Object. Hmm.. > > Could get a notary public to serve them notice of the intention to > relicense Set::Object as GPL under the requirements of the license for > Tangram. If they don't make claim, then it should be able to be > relicensed, I'd guess. I'm not sure that would hold up in the US. The original authors are fully permitted to create something that is license incompatible and not redistributable by anyone other than them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review