[Bug 447456] Review Request: gupnp-tools: a collection of dev tools utilising GUPnP and GTK+

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447456





--- Comment #16 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>  2008-10-21 06:38:30 EDT ---
> - according to guidelines, "--vendor=fedora" should be used for
> desktop-file-install

Actually according to the packaging guidelines the Vendor should only be set if
there isn't one already in use. They already use 'gupnp'
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files

> - the %files section could be written with just 3 lines:
>   %{_datadir}/gupnp-tools
>   %{_bindir}/gupnp*
>   %{_datadir}/applications/*.desktop

Yes, I'm aware of that but the reason I tend to do it the other way is that you
don't get unexpected files that may be introduced on a new release. Its one of
those 6 to one, hlaf a dozen to the other things.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]