Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429882 --- Comment #13 from Dwayne Bailey <dwayne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-20 09:17:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > I'm trying to work through some of these old tickets; are you still interested > in getting this package into Fedora? Yes as its used by other software that we are packaging. > Some observations: > > Builds fine; rpmlint for me has only an erroneous complaint about permissions > on the .so file. Not sure if that need fixing? > The page I get from visiting the URL doesn't seem to have anything at all to do > with this software. Is there an actual upstream URL? No their isn't the software seems to have disappeared but is hosted in various places around the net. > Where goes genextdoc.py come from? You should provide its full location in > Source1: if possible. I'm not really sure, it simply wasn't part of the tarball that I discovered and I found it through Google codesearch and pushed it into the package. > Otherwise everything looks OK to me; just let me know if you'd like for me to > do a full review. If you are willing to do a full review that would be great. If I know its going to move forward then I can spend more time correcting issues that you pick up. So that's a YES! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review