Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035 --- Comment #10 from Joe Orton <jorton@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-20 06:40:09 EDT --- Splitting the backend plugin DSOs into separate binary packages seems like the right thing to do: - each KDE/GNOME/etc DSO must have shared library dependencies on the respective environment libraries - those library dependencies must be reflected (automatically) in RPM package dependencies - putting the plugins in the main package would therefore pull in all the necessary dependencies in KDE/GNOME/etc It might be a good idea to get the -plugins- packages pulled in via some other deps, or simply by updating comps to ensure they get installed by default. I've updated neon upstream to add support for libproxy, BTW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review