Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466692 Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus@xxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> 2008-10-17 14:38:26 EDT --- I don't think it makes sense to package a main iml package with only doc, just put everything in -devel. doc/liblink should be shipped. I don't really like the name, it is very short and prone to conflicts, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Use_of_common_namespace I doubt that upstream is willing to reconsider th ename, though. I propose adding %check make check You could ship ChangeLog if you feel like it. rpmlint gives: iml.i386: E: no-binary iml-devel.i386: W: no-documentation iml-debuginfo.i386: E: empty-debuginfo-package The 2 first should be fixed by removing main package. You can fix the 3rd if you want to (it is mandated by the guidelines, but I disagree, and I will approve even with this issue). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review