[Bug 462446] Review Request: ttf2pt1 - TrueType to Adobe Type 1 font converter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462446





--- Comment #14 from Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx>  2008-10-17 04:09:11 EDT ---
* rpmlint warnins are all ignorable (see above)

ttf2pt1.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/ttf2pt1/encodings/latin4/iso8859-4
ttf2pt1.i386: E: zero-length
/usr/share/ttf2pt1/encodings/adobestd/adobe-std.tbl
ttf2pt1.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/ttf2pt1/encodings/latin5/iso8859-9
ttf2pt1.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/ttf2pt1/encodings/latin1/iso8859-1.tbl
ttf2pt1.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/ttf2pt1-3.4.4/TeX/cjk-latex-config
ttf2pt1.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/ttf2pt1-3.4.4/TeX/sfd2map
ttf2pt1.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/ttf2pt1/encodings/latin2/iso8859-2.tbl
ttf2pt1.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/ttf2pt1-3.4.4/TeX/cjk-latex-t1mapgen
ttf2pt1.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/ttf2pt1/encodings/latin4/iso8859-4.tbl
ttf2pt1.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/ttf2pt1-3.4.4/convert.cfg.sample
ttf2pt1.i386: W: doc-file-dependency
/usr/share/doc/ttf2pt1-3.4.4/TeX/cjk-latex-config perl(Getopt::Long)
ttf2pt1.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/ttf2pt1-3.4.4/TeX/sfd2map
perl(Getopt::Long)
ttf2pt1.i386: W: doc-file-dependency
/usr/share/doc/ttf2pt1-3.4.4/TeX/cjk-latex-config perl(English)
ttf2pt1.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/ttf2pt1-3.4.4/TeX/sfd2map
perl(English)

* follow guidelines
* match upstream:
cb143c07cc83167875ca09ea720d4932  ./ttf2pt1-3.4.4.tgz
* %files section right

Only one issue left, it doesn't build for me with %{_smp_mflags}.
Log is at
http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/ttf2pt1-failed.out

My guess is that the 2 calls of
scripts/html2man . . <FONTS.html
trigger a logical race condition. So either you remove %{_smp_mflags}
or you handle it otherwise.

This is APPROVED if you remove %{_smp_mflags}, otherwise please repost
a .src.rpm.

I will approve you as packager. You'll only be able to change the 
package you own or you have explicit commit right on. Later you may
become ultrapackager (the name is subject to change, this is very new)
which allows you to modify others packages. 

As a side note, in the past there was only the equivalent of the 
ultrapackager, and I would happily have given you this level of trust
but being more on the safe side is good, so for now you'll be only
packager, but feel free to ask me for being ultrapackager as soon
as you feel that having the access to others packages will simplify
your work in fedora.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]