Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462446 --- Comment #14 from Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> 2008-10-17 04:09:11 EDT --- * rpmlint warnins are all ignorable (see above) ttf2pt1.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/ttf2pt1/encodings/latin4/iso8859-4 ttf2pt1.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/ttf2pt1/encodings/adobestd/adobe-std.tbl ttf2pt1.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/ttf2pt1/encodings/latin5/iso8859-9 ttf2pt1.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/ttf2pt1/encodings/latin1/iso8859-1.tbl ttf2pt1.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/ttf2pt1-3.4.4/TeX/cjk-latex-config ttf2pt1.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/ttf2pt1-3.4.4/TeX/sfd2map ttf2pt1.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/ttf2pt1/encodings/latin2/iso8859-2.tbl ttf2pt1.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/ttf2pt1-3.4.4/TeX/cjk-latex-t1mapgen ttf2pt1.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/ttf2pt1/encodings/latin4/iso8859-4.tbl ttf2pt1.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/ttf2pt1-3.4.4/convert.cfg.sample ttf2pt1.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/ttf2pt1-3.4.4/TeX/cjk-latex-config perl(Getopt::Long) ttf2pt1.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/ttf2pt1-3.4.4/TeX/sfd2map perl(Getopt::Long) ttf2pt1.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/ttf2pt1-3.4.4/TeX/cjk-latex-config perl(English) ttf2pt1.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/ttf2pt1-3.4.4/TeX/sfd2map perl(English) * follow guidelines * match upstream: cb143c07cc83167875ca09ea720d4932 ./ttf2pt1-3.4.4.tgz * %files section right Only one issue left, it doesn't build for me with %{_smp_mflags}. Log is at http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/ttf2pt1-failed.out My guess is that the 2 calls of scripts/html2man . . <FONTS.html trigger a logical race condition. So either you remove %{_smp_mflags} or you handle it otherwise. This is APPROVED if you remove %{_smp_mflags}, otherwise please repost a .src.rpm. I will approve you as packager. You'll only be able to change the package you own or you have explicit commit right on. Later you may become ultrapackager (the name is subject to change, this is very new) which allows you to modify others packages. As a side note, in the past there was only the equivalent of the ultrapackager, and I would happily have given you this level of trust but being more on the safe side is good, so for now you'll be only packager, but feel free to ask me for being ultrapackager as soon as you feel that having the access to others packages will simplify your work in fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review