[Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285


Stepan Kasal <skasal@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #12 from Stepan Kasal <skasal@xxxxxxxxxx>  2008-10-14 06:56:43 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#NonNumericRelease

As mentioned in comment #10, I'm convinced the non-standard version tag should
stay in this case.

> - source matches upstream FAIL -> source at upstream is in tar.gz format

Fixed in release 34.

> - no unnecessary BR FAIL
> [...]
> Please fix the source and useless dependency.

??? BuildRequires: perl-libxml-perl perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
I see no problem here.

(In reply to comment #10)
> perl-XML-Grove.noarch: E: useless-explicit-provides perl(XML::Grove)
> This package provides 2 times the same capacity. It should only provide it
> once.

No explicit provides.
Both "perl(XML::Grove)" and "perl(XML::Grove) = 0.46" are generated.
It might be a bug in rpmlint or the dependency generator, but not in this
package.

> perl-XML-Grove.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency
> /usr/share/doc/perl-XML-Grove-0.46alpha/examples/my-html.pl
> perl(XML::Parser::PerlSAX)
> An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in
> the package.  Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example
> scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation.
> 
> (the latter is repeated twice)

Again, these are bogus.  The *.pl files in doc do not have their executable bit
set, and the require "perl(XML::Parser::PerlSAX)" is justified by other *.pm
files in the package.

To sum up, the review passed.

Several issues about rpmlint and/or the dependency generator are due to be
filed.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]