Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-14 00:55:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Re #14: > There is no qt-designer for qt4 and fmit needs it. What I am asking is why this package needs both qt4 and qt3. As far as I checked the build log (for example: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=862773&name=build.log ) this package needs libqt-mt.so.3, which is in qt3 and not in qt(4) and the rebuilt binary rpm does not seem to have dependencies for qt4 packages. More explicit question is "Is qt(4)-devel really required for BuildRequires?" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review