Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 --- Comment #35 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-13 17:27:46 EDT --- 1. Anyway, if you revert the conf.avail stuff the package is APPROVED. You can continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a now. Please don't forget the comps and wiki bits. 2. Please apply whatever fixes are relevant to the un-core-fonts packages. If un-core-fonts extra fontconfig files are 66, that means un-core-fonts fontconfig files probably need to be 65 (and you need to check with Jens Petersen that does not break japanese). Lastly, do continue to ask upstream : 3. to add the FSF font exception to their licensing. 4. to publish sfds This font package was unusually complex. Congratulations on staying with us so far :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review