Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466762 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla <limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-13 14:59:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > > service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/ipmievd > > I agree that it should not be. Disabling its autostart is part of the patch > submitted in bug 466343: > > -# chkconfig: 345 99 00 > +# chkconfig: - 99 00 > > > incoherent-init-script-name ipmievd > > Fixable, or does this coorespond with what's in openipmi-tools? > > IMHO, there's nothing to fix here - the init script specifically starts > ipmievd, not ipmitool... rpmlint is being a bit silly here. Agreed. > > "Obsoletes: OpenIPMI-tools < 2.0.14-3" missing (and possibly "Provides: > OpenIPMI-tools = 2.0.14-3" if you think it's necessary, see > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Renaming.2Freplacing_existing_packages) > > From bug 466343: "BuildRequires: freeipmi-devel" should be added, or freeipmi > support explicitly disabled for reproducible builds. > > From bug 466343: configure with --disable-dependency-tracking for slight build > speedup and cleaner build logs? Works for me. > Source0 URL does not match recommended sf.net one: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net The DNS resolves the same way, but there's no harm fixing it. > Wouldn't configuring with --enable-file-security be desirable? Possbily, not sure of the ramifications. Jan? > "Requires: OpenIPMI" missing? Probably, yes, I think I misunderstood the relationship here. Not needed to build, but it would require at runtime, no? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review