Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464432 --- Comment #12 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-13 07:37:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Upstream replies: > > "It turns out that one of the octopus developers (Xavier Andrade) has > decided to try to remove METIS, substituting it by a free alternative > (ZOLTAN). We also removed expokit, and as I said qshep is also > non-essential. So it may very well be that next release of octopus > (unknown date) will be free of license problems." That's encouraging. > Until a license problem free version is available, octopus cannot be packaged. Or you could try backporting whatever changes they made to remove the non-free code, but that's up to you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review