Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461338 --- Comment #4 from Anthony Messina <amessina@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-09 05:41:54 EDT --- Excellent work Jeff, and thank you!. I've been following your devel process on this as I'm just about prepared to switch over to DAHDI (when you're able to build the asterisk-1.6 RPMs. In conjunction with that, I'll be building my own kernel modules package and I'm trying to keep it so that it will fit nicely with your official Fedora packages. On that note, would it be unreasonable to suggest that the resulting package that contains everything except -per -libs and -devel be named "dahdi-tools" to stay inline with the upstream naming? Then folks would be looking for: dahdi-tools dahdi-perl dahdi-libs dahdi-devel from Fedora, and looking for (perhaps): dahdi-linux-`uname -r` dahdi-firmware either by building themselves or from people like me or Axel Thimm. It's not a big deal, just a suggestion. Again, thanks for the work. I hope to see this accepted soon so we can move up on asterisk-1.6.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review