[Bug 455426] Review Request: gstreamer-java - Java interface to the gstreamer framework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455426





--- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  2008-10-09 02:07:59 EDT ---
For 1.0-0.2

* SourceURL
  - SourceURL seems 404. By the way is 1.0 really released?

* Requires/Obsoletes
(In reply to comment #10)
> but i don't know if i not add
> requires for gstreamer-plugins-base < 0.10.19 the one can install
> gstreamer-java which is not working in some case which is the reason for
> requires in spec file....

  - In this case I don't think we must ensure the full function
    of gstreamer-java should work.

    While it may be reasonable to add 
    "Requires: gstreamer-plugins-base >= 0.10.19", IMO
    "Requires: gstreamer-plugins-good >= 0.10.7" is superfluous and
    this Requires (i.e. for gstreamer-plugins-good) should be changed
    to "Conflicts".
    By the way it is safe to add "Conflicts: gstreamer-plugins-ugly < 0.10.7"
    or so.

* Group
  - of -javadoc subpackage should simply be "Documentation".

* Pre-shipped binaries
  - Would you explain what many binary files under .hg directory are?
    Cannot this directory completely be deleted?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]