Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #4 from Ankur Sinha <sanjay_ankur@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-07 12:13:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > rpmlint on binary package: > > 69oldstandard-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/doc/69oldstandard-fonts-1/OFL-FAQ.txt > 69oldstandard-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/doc/69oldstandard-fonts-1/OFL.txt > 69oldstandard-fonts.noarch: E: description-line-too-long Old Standard is an > attempt to provide a high quality font, suitable for classical, biblical and > medieval studies as well as for general-purpose typesetting in languages which > use Greek or Cyrillic script, > 69oldstandard-fonts.noarch: E: no-changelogname-tag > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings. > > (In reply to comment #2) > > The spec file and package name differ. Shouldn't the package be named > > 69oldstandard as you also originally submitted? > > Rather I guess you intended to rename it to oldstandard-fonts. updated the packages.. http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/69oldstandard-fonts-1-1.fc9.src.rpm http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/69oldstandard-fonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review