Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452901 --- Comment #11 from Patrick Monnerat <pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-07 06:00:36 EDT --- Thanks for your review, Mamoru Line 234 above (openca-prefix) is OK, since it is unused (presumably reminiscent from a larger project, openca, from which ocspd is derived). I have uploaded a new version: http://www.etude-riondel.ch/pm/ocspd.spec http://www.etude-riondel.ch/pm/ocspd-1.5.1-rc1.3.fc8.src.rpm _ %files have been reworked according to your suggestion (thanks for it :-). _ autoheader called in spec file, effectively removing the warning you mention _ configure file patched to unambiguously remove option "--disable-shared" and option removed from spec file. _ User creation reworked according to the new directives _ .fc8 removed from comment Successful mock fedora-devel-i386 rpmlint binary RPM says: ocspd.i386: W: non-standard-uid /etc/ocspd/private ocspd ocspd.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/ocspd/private 0700 ocspd.i386: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/ocspd ocspd} Same explanation as for 1.5.1-0.1.rc1 for the 2 firsts. Subsys OK (ocspd) after shell processing: the last rpmlint report is a misunderstanding of the shell script by rpmlint. rpmlint spec, source and debuginfo reports none. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review