Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464429 --- Comment #3 from Charles R. Anderson <cra@xxxxxxx> 2008-10-06 21:07:02 EDT --- Ok, so I missed this one and made my own: Spec URL: http://cra.fedorapeople.org/Judy/Judy.spec SRPM URL: http://cra.fedorapeople.org/Judy/Judy-1.0.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Some differences I note: - I named mine "Judy" not "judy". This matches the upstream tarball name and hence doesn't require %setup -n Judy-%{version}. I believe this is desirable according to the Naming Guidelines: "General Naming When naming a package, the name should match the upstream tarball or project name from which this software came. In some cases, this naming choice may be more complicated. If this package has been packaged by other distributions/packagers in the past, then you should try to match their name for consistency. In any case, try to use your best judgement, and other developers will help in the final decision." - "%configure --disable-static" to prevent building static libraries altogether--better than just deleting them afterwards. - I packaged the HTML versions of the docs. Would you consider my changes and like to co-maintain this package once it gets in? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review