Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2008-10-06 16:58:13 EDT --- > # The source for this package was pulled from upstream's vcs. Use the > # following commands to generate the tarball: > # svn co https://pymol.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/pymol/branches/b11/pymol pymol-1.1 > # tar cvzf pymol-1.1-20080912svn3419.tar.gz pymol-1.1 > Source0: pymol-1.1-20080912svn3419.tar.gz - More exactly: svn co -r 3419 https://pymol.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/pymol/branches/b11/pymol pymol-1.1 so you don't get the current revision. - Group: Development/Tools Wouln't Applications/Engineering be a better choice? This is a atomistic visualisation program, after all. (Applications/Science would of course be better if it existed..) - Separate BuildRequires and Requires should be made for each required package. - export RPM_OPT_FLAGS="-O2" Is there some reason not to use %optflags? - typo %%doc in changelog. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review