Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #30 from ritz <rkhadgar@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-04 07:30:14 EDT --- > I understand why the .la could be needed at runtime for the > dlopened modules, but is really %{_libdir}/librep.la needed > at build time? fixed. >The %version is still wrong, should be 0.X.20081003svn.... fixed http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/librep.spec http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/librep-0.17.2-0.2.20081003svn.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review