Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #21 from ritz <rkhadgar@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-03 17:59:30 EDT --- > I notice a bunch of .la files packaged. Generally these should not be packaged; > do you have some specific reason for doing so? need them to build rep-gtk, or anything for that matter with rep. this is needed. added these to devel package. > Indeed -el subupackages are, unless I am wrong, like -devel subpackages. It > seems to me that the 'compiled' emacs module is missing. That being said, I > know next to nothing about emacs. I do not see any reason to build them. is this really required ? > The files in devel in /usr/lib/rep/%{_host} seem dubious. Are they really > of use? Yes, to build any apps againt rep. updated package http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/librep.spec http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/librep-0.17.2-1.20081003svn.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review