Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465534 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-03 15:33:00 EDT --- I don't see that Artem is in the packager group (or in FAS at all unless my searching skills are lacking) so I'd guess not, but I'll go ahead and set NEEDSPONSOR anyway. The package will need some work before its acceptable, though: awesfx.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/awesfx-0.5.1c/gu11-rom/ADDENDUM.TXT awesfx.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/midi/GU11-ROM.SF2 awesfx.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/awesfx-0.5.1c/gu11-rom/GU11-ROM.INS awesfx.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/awesfx-0.5.1c/gu11-rom/GU11-ROM.TXT awesfx.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot Utility programs for the AWE32/Emu10k1 sound driver. awesfx.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long the AWE32/Emu10k1 sound driver. AWESFX includes asxfload and sfxload, the soundfont awesfx.x86_64: W: invalid-license GPL/distributable awesfx-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license GPL/distributable Also, this all seems to conflict with the statement in bug 405131 that awesfx is quite obsolete now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review