Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463791 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-03 14:25:32 EDT --- A couple of issues/questions: I don't see the point in the obsoletes of ancient db versions being in this compat package. Honestly I don't see the point of them being in the base db package (since we don't support upgrades from any release which would have them and there is probably never been a Fedora release that had them) but that's a different review ticket. I have no idea what yum would do with an unversioned non-provided obsolete that appears in more than one package, but it's probably not something we want to worry about. I can't actually install these packages since they conflict with the existing compat-db package which is a rather essential system component. I'm not sure how I could actually do that without composing a new OS tree so I'm just not going to worry about it. What's the point of the -devel package? I was under the impression that we didn't want -devel packages for compat libraries, and the existing compat-db package doesn't have one. What happens to the /usr/bin/db45* executables and /usr/bin/berkeley_db45_svc? After this split, what becomes of the db 4.3 stuff? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review