Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464432 --- Comment #10 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-02 06:47:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Is there an automatic tool to check the licenses of the source files? I'm using licensecheck.pl from debian-utils. Perhaps it could be added to fedora-rpmdevtools. > > - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual > > license. > > > > License: GPLv2+ > > Should be GPLv3+. IIUC LGPLv3+ libraries can only be linked in if GPLv2+ > > sources are "upgraded" to GPLv3. I'll re-check this, but I think I'm correct. > > OK. Funny, I based my SPEC on the SRPM available from the Octopus website. > You'd think the developers had their licenses right.. See comment #8. > > SRPM source file doesn't match upstream: > > 54e00d2eb2af7fbd902876bef32b409e octopus-3.0.1.tar.gz > > e17887506f2596e1826d2d09bc75214f octopus-3.0.1.tar.gz.srpm > > Used the one from upstream SRPM. My bad. Maybe ask upstream why they are different? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review