Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464171 --- Comment #4 from Sergio Pascual <sergio.pasra@xxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-01 04:04:39 EDT --- New package: Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/gedit-latex-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/gedit-latex-plugin-0.1.3.2-2.fc9.src.rpm Licence: the code says "version 2 or or (at your option) any later version.". See for example Logger.py or graphics/GraphicsDialog.py. What it's true is that some files doesn't mention any license at all (GraphicsSourceBuilder.py). I think the license is GPL2v+ The rest of the issues are fixed. rpmlint still gives two errors, but I think they can be ignored in our case gedit-latex-plugin.x86_64: E: no-binary gedit-latex-plugin.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review