[Bug 464621] Review Request: etherboot - roms needed for pxe boot

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464621





--- Comment #5 from Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@xxxxxxxxxx>  2008-09-30 15:34:12 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> The only concern here is that the 32bit built roms on x86_64 will not be the
> same as those used on i386, due to the different optflags in use.
> 

Even before introducing optflags, the x86_64 binaries were not bitwise-equal to
the i386 ones (I didn't check how different they were), I guess there are
differences (small ones, I expect) on the way gcc behaves when running native
32-bit or compiling 32-bit binaries on x86_64. But I don't expect the binaries
to be exactly the same, anyway.

> Maybe we could use:
> 
> EXTRA_CLFAGS="`echo %{__global_cflags} |sed 's|-fstack-protector||g'`"
> 
> That should avoid the -m32/-m64 issues that are causing the failure on x86_64.

That may work.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]