Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464621 --- Comment #5 from Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-09-30 15:34:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > The only concern here is that the 32bit built roms on x86_64 will not be the > same as those used on i386, due to the different optflags in use. > Even before introducing optflags, the x86_64 binaries were not bitwise-equal to the i386 ones (I didn't check how different they were), I guess there are differences (small ones, I expect) on the way gcc behaves when running native 32-bit or compiling 32-bit binaries on x86_64. But I don't expect the binaries to be exactly the same, anyway. > Maybe we could use: > > EXTRA_CLFAGS="`echo %{__global_cflags} |sed 's|-fstack-protector||g'`" > > That should avoid the -m32/-m64 issues that are causing the failure on x86_64. That may work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review